Amplified black hole algorithm for real power loss reduction

Document Type: Research Paper


Department of EEE Prasad V.Potluri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Kanuru, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh -520007.


This work presents Amplified Black Hole Algorithm (ABHA) for solving optimal reactive power problem. In the projected approach ABHA, Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) is merged with Black Hole Algorithm (BHA). Power loss reduction is the key objective in the proposed work. The gravitational force between stars and the progression of stars to the black hole is attuned while explore the solution space. Assumption made that heavy objects are stars in a gravitational system, which become black holes and the exploitation of GSA is enhanced. During the progression of the projected algorithm, the radius of the black hole diminishes and more objects are included, which assist to stop early convergence. To improve the exploration and exploitation, stars gravity information has been utilized. During the progression of the projected algorithm, the radius of the black hole diminishes, and more objects are included, which assist to stop early convergence. Some of the most excellent objects turn out to be the black hole, affect other objects by their sturdy gravity. The other objects are alienated into two groups: Heavy agents and light agents. Proposed ABHA has been tested in standard IEEE 14, 30, 57, 118, 300 bus test systems and simulation results show the projected algorithm reduced the real power loss comprehensively.


Main Subjects

[1]     Lee, K. Y., Park, Y. M., & Ortiz, J. L. (1984, May). Fuel-cost minimisation for both real-and reactive-power dispatches. In IEE proceedings C (generation, transmission and distribution) (Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 85-93). IET Digital Library.

[2]     Deeb, N. I., & Shahidehpour, S. M. (1988). An efficient technique for reactive power dispatch using a revised linear programming approach. Electric power systems research15(2), 121-134.

[3]     Bjelogrlic, M., Calovic, M. S., Ristanovic, P., & Babic, B. S. (1990). Application of Newton's optimal power flow in voltage/reactive power control. IEEE transactions on power systems5(4), 1447-1454.

[4]     Granville, S. (1994). Optimal reactive dispatch through interior point methods. IEEE transactions on power systems9(1), 136-146.

[5]     Grudinin, N. (1998). Reactive power optimization using successive quadratic programming method. IEEE transactions on power systems13(4), 1219-1225.

[6]     Mei, R. N. S., Sulaiman, M. H., Mustaffa, Z., & Daniyal, H. (2017). Optimal reactive power dispatch solution by loss minimization using moth-flame optimization technique. Applied soft computing59, 210-222.

[7]     Chen, G., Liu, L., Zhang, Z., & Huang, S. (2017). Optimal reactive power dispatch by improved GSA-based algorithm with the novel strategies to handle constraints. Applied soft computing50, 58-70.

[8]     Naderi, E., Narimani, H., Fathi, M., & Narimani, M. R. (2017). A novel fuzzy adaptive configuration of particle swarm optimization to solve large-scale optimal reactive power dispatch. Applied soft computing53, 441-456.

[9]     Heidari, A. A., Abbaspour, R. A., & Jordehi, A. R. (2017). Gaussian bare-bones water cycle algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch in electrical power systems. Applied soft computing57, 657-671.

[10] Morgan, M., Abdullah, N. R. H., Sulaiman, M. H., Mustafa, M., & Samad, R. (2016). Benchmark studies on optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) based multi-objective evolutionary programming (MOEP) using mutation based on adaptive mutation operator (AMO) and polynomial mutation operator (PMO). Journal of electrical systems12(1), 121-132.

[11] Mei, R. N. S., Sulaiman, M. H., & Mustaffa, Z. (2016). Ant lion optimizer for optimal reactive power dispatch solution. Journal of electrical systems," Special Issue AMPE2015, 68-74.

[12] Anbarasan, P., & Jayabarathi, T. (2017, April). Optimal reactive power dispatch problem solved by symbiotic organism search algorithm. 2017 innovations in power and advanced computing technologies (i-PACT) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

[13] Basu, M. (2016). Quasi-oppositional differential evolution for optimal reactive power dispatch. International journal of electrical power & energy systems78, 29-40.

[14] Salehi, N., & Askarzadeh, H. R. (2018). Optimum solar and wind model with particle optimization (PSO). Research in industrial engineering7(4), 460-467.

[15] Rabbi, M. F., Chakrabarty, N., & Shefa, J. (2018). Implementation of fuzzy rule-based algorithms in p control chart to improve the performance of statistical process control. International journal of research in industrial engineering7(4), 441-459.

[16] Heidari, A. A., & Abbaspour, R. A. (2014). Improved black hole algorithm for efficient low observable UCAV path planning in constrained aerospace. Advances in computer science: an international journal3(3), 87-92.

[17] Liu, J., Xing, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). A gravitational search algorithm with adaptive mixed mutation for function optimization. International journal of performability engineering14(4). DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.18.04.p11.681690

[18] The IEEE-test systems. (1993). Retrieved from

[19] Hussain, A. N., Abdullah, A. A., & Neda, O. M. (2018). Modified particle swarm optimization for solution of reactive power dispatch. Research journal of applied sciences, engineering and technology15(8), 316-327.

[20] Salkuti, S. R. (2017). Optimal reactive power scheduling using cuckoo search algorithm. International journal of electrical and computer engineering7(5), 2349.

[21] Reddy, S. S., Bijwe, P. R., & Abhyankar, A. R. (2014). Faster evolutionary algorithm based optimal power flow using incremental variables. International journal of electrical power & energy systems54, 198-210.