Document Type : Research Paper


Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna-9203, Bangladesh.


Selecting the right lean tool is one of the most challenging tasks for decision-makers. This research represents an integration of two methods, Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and TOPSIS, to evaluate and prioritize the lean tools. The aim of this research is to propose an integrated QFD-TOPSIS method for finding and ranking the major wastes on a production floor and also prioritize lean tools for eliminating them. The proposed model consists of House Of Quality (HOQ) to identify major waste signs which transform them into seven wastes. A set of relative weights of the wastes were then determined which were input in the TOPSIS method to prioritize suitable lean tools.


Main Subjects

[1]      Kumaraswamy, A. H., Bhattacharya, A., Kumar, V., & Brady, M. (2011, September). An integrated QFD-TOPSIS methodology for supplier selection in SMEs. 2011 third international conference on computational intelligence, modelling & simulation (pp. 271-276). 10.1109/CIMSim.2011.55
[2]      Sullivan, L. P. (1986). Quality function deployment. Quality progress (ASQC), 39-50.
[3]      Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: a state of the art survey. In Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (pp. 58-191). Springer.
[4]      Rawabdeh, I. A. (2011). Waste elimination using quality function deployment. International journal of services and operations management10(2), 216-238.
[5]      Pang, J., Zhang, G., & Chen, G. (2011). Application of aggregate analysis for product design quality using QFD model and TOPSIS. Mechanics17(6), 661-664.
[6]      Zendehdel, N. N., Sobhanallahi, M. A., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2017). A novel hybrid approach based on QFD-TOPSIS method for supplier selection in IT area (case study: a private bank in Iran). 13th international conference on industrial engineering (IIEC2017).
[7]      Kavosi, M., Mozaffari, M. M., & Kiani Mavi, R. (2011). Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using TOPSIS method. International journal of quality engineering and technology2(1), 63-74.
[8]      Hojjati, S. M. H., & Anvary, A. (2013). An integrated SAW, TOPSIS method for ranking the major lean practices based on four attributes. World applied sciences journal28(11), 1862-1871.
[9]      Karimi, B. H., Mozafari, M. M., & Asli, M. N. (2012). Applying a hybrid QFD-TOPSIS method to design product in the industry (case study in sum service company). Research journal of applied sciences, engineering and technology4(18), 3283-3288.
[10]   Mohanraj, R., Sakthivel, M., & Vinodh, S. (2011). QFD integrated value stream mapping: an enabler of lean manufacturing. International journal of productivity and quality management7(4), 501-522.
[11]   Nikjo, B., Rezaeian, J., & Javadian, N. (2015). Decision making in best player selection: an integrated approach with AHP and extended TOPSIS methods based on WeFA freamwork in MAGDM problems. International journal of research in industrial engineering4(1 (4)), 1-14.
[12]   Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Heydari Alvar, M. (2012). A new method for ranking efficient DMUs based on TOPSIS and virtual DMUs. International journal of research in industrial engineering1(1), 1-9.
[13]   Rahpeyma, B., & Zarei, M. (2018). An integrated QFD-TOPSIS approach for supplier selection under fuzzy environment: a case of detergent manufacturing industry. International journal of service science, management, engineering, and technology (IJSSMET)9(3), 62-81.
[14]   Osorio-Gómez, J. C., & Manotas-Duque, D. F. (2019). Fuzzy QFD and TOPSIS for dispatching prioritization in maritime transportation considering operational risk. In: García Alcaraz J., Rivera Cadavid L., González-Ramírez R., Leal Jamil G., Chong Chong M. (Eds.),  Best practices in manufacturing processes (pp. 97-116). Cham: Springer.
[15]   Sobhanallahi, M. A., Zendehdel Nobari, N., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2019). An aggregated supplier selection method based on QFD and TOPSIS (case study: A financial institution). Journal of optimization in industrial engineering12(1), 31-40.
[16]   Torgul, B., Paksoy, T., & Weber, G. W. (2018). A combined AHP-QFD-TOPSIS approach for supplier selection. Human factors in contemporary organizations (XXXI international seminar of ergonomics). DEStech Publications, Inc.
[17]   Pramanik, D., Haldar, A., Mondal, S. C., Naskar, S. K., & Ray, A. (2017). Resilient supplier selection using AHP-TOPSIS-QFD under a fuzzy environment. International journal of management science and engineering management12(1), 45-54.
[18]   Büyüközkan, G., & Uztürk, D. (2017, July). Combined QFD TOPSIS approach with 2-tuple linguistic information for warehouse selection. 2017 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[19]   Cho, J., Chun, J., Kim, I., & Choi, J. (2017). Preference evaluation system for construction products using QFD-TOPSIS logic by considering trade-off technical characteristics. Mathematical problems in engineering.