Document Type : Research Paper


Department of Chemical Engineering,National Iran Gas Company, Iran.


Today, the use of risk assessment methods in various industries is expanding, as there are currently more than 70 different types of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods in the world. These methods are usually used to identify, control and mitigate the effects of hazards. Organizations should be able to select one or a combination of several types of risk assessment methods that are explored and studied in this article. In some cases, and for the direction of some sensitive processes, especially in the chemical industry, the production of explosive and combustion products such as the gas transmission company should be analyzed before determining the type of method of all methods and the best approach with regard to financial resources, requires qualitative or quantitative or qualitative and quantitative information, time limits, trained personnel limitations, the type of application of the risk identification method, the advantages, and disadvantages of each of these systems. Generally, acceptable risk levels are different for each organization or individual, depending on financial and economic resources, technological constraints, experienced human resources, discretion and management, and underlying risks such as hidden risks. Organizations usually require a system that, in addition to assessing their activities and processes can help them determine the risk situation, determine risk tolerance criteria, and accurately determine the exact risk of their processes, and ... lead them, depending on the complexity of the activity of each industry, the type of system that can bring them to the target. Is different. In this study, the assessment of the risks of gas Transmission facilities in the 9 regions, has been studied and reviewed. After identifying the various activities of the facility, which included three safety measures for equipment, personal and environmental health, and 28 sub-criteria, from previous studies and surveys, and staff comments. Then, using AHP, the fuzzy questionnaire was completed. Pairwise comparison of criteria and sub-criteria by experts and the use of excel software resulted in the weight of the sub-criteria and the compatibility rate. Then, using the verbal variables, five boost pressure facility with Fuzzy TOPSIS was ranked according to the relevant criteria, and the Rasht boost pressure gained the first rank.


Main Subjects

[1]      Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., ... & Banks, S. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and human behavior24(1), 83-100.
[2]      Lak, A., Hashemi, V., & Rashtchian, D. (2005). Risk assessment methods and an example of its implementation in a petrochemical complex. The 10th national congress on chemical engineering of Iran. University of Sistan and Baluchestan. (In Persian)
[3]      Pordel, Y., Varshosaz, K., & Dehghani, M. (1393). Environmental risk assessment of Potawa 2 and 3 pressure boost station at the exploitation stage using the AHP method. Second national and specialized conference on environmental research in Iran. Hamedan. (In Persian)
[4]      Khakpour, M. M. (2014). Risk management in road construction projects between pressure reduction stations using Fuzzy AHP (Master's Degree, Payam-e-Noor Alborz University, Alborz, Iran). Retrieved from (In Persian)
[5]      Azadnia, A. H., & Irahimi Maleshah, m .E. (2009). Selection of suitable method for gas supply projects using AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. 5th international project management conference. Industrial & Research Group, Tehran. (In Persian)
[6]      Nazam, M., Xu, J., Tao, Z., Ahmad, J., & Hashim, M. (2015). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for the risk assessment of green supply chain implementation in the textile industry. International journal of supply and operations management2(1), 548.
[7]      Roudini, M. (2015). Application of fuzzy ahp and fuzzy topsis in selecting proper contractors: case of Sistan and Baluchistan province Gas Company (Doctoral dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)-Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi (DAÜ)). Retrieved from
[8]      El Khalek, H. A., Aziz, R. F., & Kamel, H. (2016). Uncertainty and Risk Factors Assessment for Cross-Country Pipelines Projects Using AHP. American journal of civil engineering, 4(1), 12-23.
[9]      Jozi, S. A., & Sadat Pouriye, A. (2017). Environmental risk assessment of Yazd combined cycle power plant. Land journal, 5(4), 69-78. (In Persian)
[10]  Jozi, S. A., & Saffarian, Sh. (2011). Environmental risk analysis of Abadan gas power plant using TOPSIS method. Journal of environmental studies, 37(58), 53-66. (I Persian).
[11]  Kengpol, A., Rontlaong, P., & Tuominen, M. (2013). A decision support system for selection of solar power plant locations by applying fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: an empirical study. Journal of software engineering and applications, 6(9). DOI:10.4236/jsea.2013.69057
[12]  Zeng, S., Chen, J., & Li, X. (2016). A hybrid method for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making. International journal of information technology & decision making15(02), 403-422.
[13]  Askaripour, A. (2015). Evaluation and comparison of fuzzy logic methods and hierarchical analysis in ranking and quantitative analysis of safety risks (case study: a combined cycle power plant). Journal of safety promotion and injury prevention, 3, 169-174.
[14]  Grandzol, J. R. (2005). Improving the faculty selection process in higher education: a case for the analytic hierarchy process. IR applications. Volume 6. Association for institutional research (NJ1).
[15]  Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., & Diabat, A. (2013). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner production47, 355-367.