A note on the generalized indices of process capability

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Statistical Quality Control and Operations Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Kolkata-700108, India.

2 Statistical Quality Control and Operations Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 110, Nelson Manickam Road, Chennai- 600029, India.

10.22105/riej.2020.237520.1137

Abstract

Process capability indices are widely used to assess whether the outputs of an in-control process meet the specifications. The commonly used indices are , , and . In most applications, the quality characteristics are assumed to follow normal distribution. But, in practice, many quality characteristics, e.g. count data, proportion defective etc. follow Poisson or binomial distributions, and these characteristics usually have one-sided specification limit. In these cases, computations of  or  using the standard formula is inappropriate. In order to alleviate the problem, some generalized indices (e.g.  index,  index,   index and  index) are proposed in literature. The variant of these indices for one-sided specification are  and ,  and ¸  and ,  and  respectively. All these indices can be computed in any process regardless of whether the quality characteristics are discrete or continuous.  However, the same value for different generalized indices and  or  signifies different capabilities for a process and this poses difficulties in interpreting the estimates of the generalized indices. In this study, the relative goodness of the generalized indices is quantifying capability of a process is assessed. It is found that only   or  gives proper assessment about the capability of a process. All other generalized indices give a false impression about the capability of a process and thus usages of those indices should be avoided. The results of analysis of multiple case study data taken from Poisson and binomial processes validate the above findings.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     Ryan, T. P. (2011). Statistical methods for quality improvement. John Wiley & Sons.
[2]     Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of quality technology18(1), 41-52.
[3]     Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (1993). Process capability indices. CRC press.
[4]     English, J. R., & Taylor, G. D. (1993). Process capability analysis—a robustness study. The international journal of production research31(7), 1621-1635.
[5]     Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (2002). Process capability indices—a review, 1992–2000. Journal of quality technology34(1), 2-19.
[6]     Chen, K. S., Huang, M. L., & Hung, Y. (2008). Process capability analysis chart with the application of Cpm. International journal of production research46(16), 4483-4499.
[7]     Wu, C. W., Pearn, W. L., & Kotz, S. (2009). An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance. International journal of production economics117(2), 338-359.
[8]     Yum, B. J., & Kim, K. W. (2011). A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009. Quality and reliability engineering international27(3), 251-268.
[9]     Chen, K. S., Wang, K. J., & Chang, T. C. (2017). A novel approach to deriving the lower confidence limit of indices C pu, C pl, and C pk in assessing process capability. International journal of production research55(17), 4963-4981.
[10] Clements, J. A. (1989). Process capability calculations, for non-normal distributions. Quality progress22(9), 95-100.
[11] Pearn, W. L., & Chen, K. S. (1995). Estimating process capability indices for non‐normal pearsonian populations. Quality and reliability engineering international11(5), 386-388.
[12] Shore, H. (1998). A new approach to analysing non-normal quality data with application to process capability analysis. International journal of production research36(7), 1917-1933.
[13] Chen, J. P. (2000). Re-evaluating the process capability indices for non-normal distributions. International journal of production research38(6), 1311-1324.
[14] Goswami, A., & Dutta, H. N. (2013). Some studies on normal and non-normal process capability indices. Int. j. math. stat. invent1(2), 31-40.
[15] Borges, W. D. S., & Ho, L. L. (2001). A fraction defective based capability index. Quality and reliability engineering international17(6), 447-458.
[16] Yeh, A. B., & Bhattcharya, S. (1998). A robust process capability index. Communications in statistics-simulation and computation27(2), 565-589.
[17] Perakis, M., & Xekalaki, E. (2002). A process capability index that is based on the proportion of conformance. Journal of statistical computation and simulation72(9), 707-718.
[18] Perakis, M., & Xekalaki, E. (2005). A process capability index for discrete processes. Journal of statistical computation and simulation75(3), 175-187.
[19] Maiti, S.S., Saha, M., & Nanda, A.K. (2010). On generalising process capability indices. Journal of quality technology and quantitative management,7(3), 279-300.
[20] Montgomery, D.C. (2009). Introduction to statistical process control, 6th edition. Jefferson City, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[21] Maravelakis, P. E. (2016). Process capability indices for data following the Poisson or binomial distribution. Quality technology & quantitative management13(2), 197-206.
[22] Sematech, N. I. S. T. (2012). NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/